All Blog Articles

From Medical Laboratory to UX Design: How My Past Shapes My Practice

Oct 11, 2025

From Medical Laboratory to UX Design: How My Past Shapes My Practice

Oct 11, 2025

From Medical Laboratory to UX Design: How My Past Shapes My Practice

Oct 11, 2025

Introduction

When I tell people that I used to work as a medical laboratorist, their first reaction is usually surprise.
“How did you go from testing blood samples to designing user experiences?”

At first glance, these fields couldn’t be more different — one involves pipettes, microscopes, and chemical reagents, while the other revolves around empathy, pixels, and digital interfaces. But in reality, the transition felt more like a shift of tools, not of mindset.

Behind both professions lies a shared foundation: accuracy, empathy, observation, and a methodical approach to problem-solving.
This is a reflection on how my background in the medical field continues to influence the way I design today.

Life in the Laboratory

Before stepping into design, I spent years surrounded by centrifuges and microscopes, processing patient samples and ensuring diagnostic accuracy. Every detail mattered — a small misstep could affect someone’s diagnosis, treatment, or even survival.

Working as a medical laboratorist trained me to:

  • Follow standardized protocols with precision

  • Observe subtle patterns that others might overlook

  • Troubleshoot anomalies under time pressure

  • Collaborate with other healthcare professionals who rely on my accuracy

It wasn’t glamorous, but it was purposeful.
And that purpose — improving human lives through careful observation — never left me. It just changed form.

Entering the World of UX Design

When I discovered UX design, it immediately clicked.
I realized that I was still doing the same thing — investigating problems, analyzing data, understanding human needs, and crafting solutions that improve lives.

Except now, instead of test tubes and specimens, I deal with user journeys, research findings, and interface components.
The environment changed, but the mindset carried over seamlessly.

UX design became my new kind of lab — a digital one where the experiments involve wireframes, prototypes, and feedback loops.

  1. Analytical Thinking: Diagnosing the Real Problem

In the laboratory, if a test result came out abnormal, you didn’t just rerun it — you diagnosed why it was abnormal.
Was there contamination? A procedural error? Equipment drift?

That same diagnostic thinking is at the heart of user experience research and design.

When a user drops off during onboarding, I don’t rush to redesign the interface. I dig deeper:
Was the content unclear? The microcopy misleading? Was the user’s intent mismatched with the flow?

UX, like medicine, demands a root-cause mindset — identifying the problem beneath the symptom.

  1. Observation & Attention to Detail

Lab work taught me to notice small details: a slightly off color in a reagent, a delayed reaction, a microscopic inconsistency.

In UX, these details often manifest as micro-interactions, spacing inconsistencies, or misleading visual hierarchies.
Subtle cues that change the entire perception of usability.

Attention to detail ensures that design decisions are intentional, not accidental — just as every lab result must be deliberate and reproducible.

  1. Empathy: From Patients to Users

In healthcare, empathy is everything. Even though laboratorists rarely meet patients directly, we always understand the human consequence behind every test. A mistake isn’t just a number — it’s someone’s life.

That awareness shaped how I approach users in design.
Behind every click, there’s a real person — frustrated, curious, or hopeful.

UX design requires the same emotional intelligence as healthcare:

  • Listening deeply

  • Interpreting behavior

  • Designing for clarity and reassurance

Empathy transforms data into understanding, and understanding into design that truly serves people.

  1. Experimentation & Iteration

Laboratory science is built on experimentation: you form a hypothesis, run controlled tests, and learn from results.

UX design mirrors this cycle perfectly.
Every A/B test, prototype, or usability session is an experiment.
Every iteration is a refinement based on data.

The lab instilled in me a scientific discipline that now guides my design process — measure, don’t guess.
Design isn’t about “what looks better.” It’s about what works better for the user.

  1. Documentation & Process Discipline

If it’s not documented in a lab, it didn’t happen.
That rule made its way into my design practice.

Today, I document design decisions, user flows, and research notes with the same rigor.
Version control, audit trails, and replicable processes keep teams aligned — just as lab documentation ensures consistency and traceability.

Process discipline doesn’t kill creativity; it gives it a foundation.

Real Moments Where My Lab Background Helped

There are many moments in my UX career where my medical background quietly surfaced:

  • During usability tests, I observed subtle facial expressions or hesitation patterns — the kind of micro-behaviors I used to notice when analyzing test samples.

  • While working on data-heavy dashboards, my comfort with precision and calibration helped ensure visual accuracy and data integrity.

  • When defining research methodologies, I leaned on my training in hypothesis formulation and statistical validation.

  • Even in design critiques, I brought a calm, evidence-based tone: “Let’s verify this with user data,” instead of “I just feel it’s better this way.”

In short, I still think like a laboratorist — but now I design like one too.

Do I encountered any challenge when transitioning?

Of course, it wasn’t all smooth.
Leaving the structured, rule-based world of healthcare for the open-ended world of design was uncomfortable.

In the lab, there’s one correct result. In UX, there are many possible answers, and they evolve with user behavior.

I had to learn to tolerate ambiguity, embrace creative failure, and value feedback over precision.
The UX world is messier — and that’s what makes it human.

But once I learned to see that ambiguity as a form of exploration rather than error, I realized it’s just another kind of experiment — an open-ended one.

Why This Background is an Asset

Having a background in healthcare gives me a different lens on design:

  • I naturally think in systems and processes

  • I value ethical responsibility in how data and design affect real people

  • I approach design not just as an art, but as a form of care

While others may start from aesthetics, I start from accuracy and empathy.
And I believe that’s what makes design meaningful — it’s not just about making things look good, but ensuring they do good.

Every product I design still carries the same mission that drove me in the lab:
to make people’s lives a little better, more understandable, and less uncertain.

Last note from my experience is,

Every experience leaves a trace.
I’m not a laboratorist anymore — but every time I structure a design system, document a flow, or analyze a user test, I can still hear the faint echo of centrifuges spinning in the background.

The difference is that now, the results aren’t printed on lab reports — they live on screens, guiding real people through digital spaces.

And to me, that’s still healing — just through pixels instead of petri dishes.

SYAIFFOLIO

SYAIFFOLIO

SYAIFFOLIO

From Medical Laboratory to UX Design: How My Past Shapes My Practice
Audiobook version

0:00/1:34

0:00/1:34

From Medical Laboratory to UX Design: How My Past Shapes My Practice
Audiobook version

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.